Saturday, March 20, 2004
40 Things Every Drunkard Should Do Before He Dies
Not that I'm a drunkard, but I'm way behind. And it looks like I've been wasting my time slapping ass because it's just not on the list.
More On My Match
Looks like Stummy took the same personality test I took at Match.com and posted her results. I linked to mine earlier but for those of you who missed it or were too lazy to click a link here are my results.
Who You AreI'm not so sure that it accurately describes myself but it does a fairly good job in articulating what I'm looking for. Now get to finding me my match.
You're always exploring
You're smart, insightful, and have an insatiable curiosity about life. In fact, you're always studying problems and finding ways to fix them. You refuse to settle long-term for a boring job or doing something just because it's expected of you. Life should be "balanced" with plenty of time for fun, spontaneity, and relaxation! You try to avoid scheduling every minute of your day and instead prefer a more informal and "go with the flow" approach. You're a private person and a little hard to get to know, especially emotionally. When you express your feelings, it's more likely through your actions and practical support than through words.
What's dating all about to you?
You believe dating and life in general is about learning and growing as a person. You're a great listener, so women tend to enjoy going out with you. However, it's hard for you to have a real intellectual connection with an attractive woman. Hopefully, you've found a way to "go with the flow" in dating as you already do in other parts of your life.
You face two major challenges in finding the love of your life. First, because you're shy, you feel like you have to be someone else or "wear a mask" to go out and meet new people. You're left feeling like a distant observer, and women find it hard to truly understand you. Second, although having a vision of what you want can be helpful, the risk is that your high standards can get in the way of loving a real-life imperfect woman.
Quirks women notice
Like all men, you have your strengths as well as your quirks and shortcomings. Ultimately, you want to find someone who will love and accept you "warts and all." Because you're a private person, it's especially important that you find a partner who understands.
You have a pretty even-tempered personality and may not have any especially annoying or quirky habits. Of course, seeming to be "perfect" could be seen as a flaw by some, in which case you may just want to pretend to have a bad habit!
Who You're Looking For
She'll be an enigma
You're looking for a woman who's smart, insightful, and has an insatiable curiosity about life. The two of you could share a very interesting and exciting intellectual connection. Getting closer emotionally takes time, since she's an independent and sometimes shy person by nature. But she's worth the effort to get to know! Your best strategy is to see her "in action" when you go out with friends but still find quiet time with her to talk. You'll discover she's a good conversationalist, especially if you get her talking about books, current events, or any of her many interests and hobbies.
Overall, it's important for you to be with someone who is almost always cheerful and has an optimistic outlook on life. The ideal person you're seeking shares a number of positive qualities with you, including:
No strong similarities were detected, which suggests that you may be more attracted to certain "opposite qualities."
Deal breakers
You seem ready to adapt to the good and frustrating qualities of the women you're looking for, but there are types of women you clearly do NOT like. Women's habits and attitudes you'd have a hard time putting up with include:
Women who are moody or overly negative.
Women who need frequent reminders that you care about them and would be upset if they thought you found another woman physically attractive.
Sex
Romantic sex
Good sex is important to you, but it's only one of many ways you connect with your partner. To you, life is about finding balance, and a romantic and satisfying sex life is a key part of your vision.
Among men your age, your particular combination of sexual drive and interests is similar to about 1 in 6 men (16%).
Is she sexually compatible?
You're looking for someone just like you, who values the quality of sex over the quantity. You want someone who would never pressure you about sex.
What's ahead for you sexually?
A good sexual match plays a key role in your "ideal" relationship. Your only risk is to have sex get too comfortable; too predictable. Since you're naturally calm and rational during fights, you miss out on great "make-up" sex! If you can bring your natural creativity and imagination to the bedroom, your sex life will never be boring.
Thought For The Day
Saw this quoted in a review of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind over at De Novo:
Chaucer’s human nature is essentially Shakespeare’s: the deepest link between the two greatest English poets was temperamental rather than intellectual or sociopolitical. Love dies or else lovers die: those are the pragmatic possibilities for the two poets, each of them experientially wise beyond wisdom.
Détente Anyone?
The whole Brian and Annie thing has me feeling like a cross between Jimmy Carter and a kid caught in the middle of divorce proceedings.
Hopefully it turns out so that I get both the Nobel Peace Prize and an ice cream cone.
Hopefully it turns out so that I get both the Nobel Peace Prize and an ice cream cone.
March Madness Day 2: Supangans Dominating
I'm bringing up the rear, 6 correct picks behind Bunny. Ellisen is tied for second, three picks behind. Their Michigan St. pick is going to hurt them though. I'm still in decent shape - as is everyone else, but this weekend should be telling - as all of my Sweet Sixteen teams are still in it.
"Instead, a convergence of three separate trends is conspiring to kill off TiVo."
Lots of Birthdays Last Night Plus One
I had dinner last night - fully dressed - with Bunny, Brian and Rose at Claim Jumper in Valencia. The night started with Rose seeing me come into the restaurant and suggesting to Bunny that they ignore me. It didn't last very long as I sat down next to her and said, "Hey." Not a few minutes after I sat down that we were paged to our table. As usual, not knowing how to judge traffic out here still, Brian had yet to arrive. So being unoriginal - this being another one of Rose's suggestions - we told the waitress that our late arriving companion was celebrating his birthday that night and told her that if she did a real good job of helping us celebrate his birthday she would get a good tip.
So Brian arrives, not too late at all, and was warmly greeted to the table by our waitress who proceeded to overtly and playfully flirt with him. This goes on for the whole night and at first Brian had no idea what was going on so he's just unwittingly playing along probably thinking that the people in Valencia are really nice. Then the waitress let slip that it was his birthday. In return, Brian almost - and actually may have, which means she was nice about it - let slip that it wasn't his birthday but saved it by saying that he didn't like to be embarrassed on his birthday and therefore didn't want anyone to know or to celebrate it, which only made our waitress promise that he would be embarrassed.
After we finished our meal, the staff came out and sang and clapped a "special" birthday song for Brian that ended with the words "splish splash".
So let that be a lesson to you. Don't be the last to arrive.
So Brian arrives, not too late at all, and was warmly greeted to the table by our waitress who proceeded to overtly and playfully flirt with him. This goes on for the whole night and at first Brian had no idea what was going on so he's just unwittingly playing along probably thinking that the people in Valencia are really nice. Then the waitress let slip that it was his birthday. In return, Brian almost - and actually may have, which means she was nice about it - let slip that it wasn't his birthday but saved it by saying that he didn't like to be embarrassed on his birthday and therefore didn't want anyone to know or to celebrate it, which only made our waitress promise that he would be embarrassed.
After we finished our meal, the staff came out and sang and clapped a "special" birthday song for Brian that ended with the words "splish splash".
So let that be a lesson to you. Don't be the last to arrive.
Moot Court Round 3
Best of luck to all those participating at the LA County Superior Court. With about a hundred people participating and 16 oral finalists, 28 oral alternates, 16 best brief writers, and 16 alternate brief writers being asked to interview for the moot court honors program; chances are good - even if there is some overlap - that you will at least get that interview. So don't worry about it and have some fun.
I'm sure section B will be overly represented.
I'm sure section B will be overly represented.
Friday, March 19, 2004
If Match.com Doesn't Work Out II...
From CNN:
Lonely-hearts will stand a better chance of finding a soul mate thanks to new mobile phone dating technology.
Would-be daters looking for a "significant other" may soon be able to subscribe to a service which stores in their phones a personal profile and information on what they want most from a partner.
When there are enough similarities between two people, and they happen to be in close proximity, the service tells their phones to communicate with each other.
Today In Class
Just in case you weren't there. We got through the terminology part of res judicata but didn't go into anything else for class 19 on the syllabus for Civ. Pro. In Torts we got through the first two cases for products liability after a preview of what's to come in the next few weeks. A standard day in law school.
MIA
Both Stummy and Brian took the day off from classes. Hmmmm.... it's enough to make one wonder if Brian was getting bossed around.
Over 12 Hours Later And Still No Chafing
In fact I'm enjoying this so much, I'm thinking about making it my Friday ritual.
First Day Of March Madness
I'm tied for eighth in a pool of fourteen. Not too bad and too far off of the lead. And the ones I did get wrong, I didn't have getting passed the second round. Seems like most everyone else is pretty much in the same boat except for one of the Supangans - shouldn't it be Turners? - who had Michigan St. getting to the Final Four, ouch.
Yesterday
I was nominated and ran unopposed, securing me a position on APALSA's Board as their SBA liaison. So next year I'm VP Stummy's go between bitch. Lucky me.
UPDATE: Here's the full, short story. Stummy nominated me for the position against my wishes thinking it would help me. Thanks Macy. And even though I was running unopposed I had to give an improptu speech. So here's what I said,
UPDATE: Here's the full, short story. Stummy nominated me for the position against my wishes thinking it would help me. Thanks Macy. And even though I was running unopposed I had to give an improptu speech. So here's what I said,
Basically, I was nominated so I could hook up with this chick. So vote for me.Short and eloquent, the way all speeches should be.
Underwear Isn't A Necessity
To her credit, Stummy made it to ten days without shopping so if you took the over, you won. She denies though that buying a bra counts as shopping because bras are a necessity, which means she is still keeping true to her self-imposed shopping ban. To prove her squirrelly ignorance - or mine - I am not wearing underwear today. Let's see if I can make it through the day.
Thursday, March 18, 2004
Wednesday, March 17, 2004
Stummy Lied
Unless she was wearing black lace panties with matching bra, Stummy didn't wear black as I was told to expect. Apparently her feelings for April don't run as deep as Brian's feelings for Cameran. You know he would properly mourn if something should happen.
According to Annie's Theory, this Cameran chick had to be fat at one point in her life.
According to Annie's Theory, this Cameran chick had to be fat at one point in her life.
People find Cameran's beauty so stunning that they are shocked when they find her so warm, friendly and down to earth.
Fordyce Word Of The Day
feculence
\Fec"u*lence\, n. [L. faeculentia dregs, filth: cf. F. f['e]culence.] 1. The state or quality of being feculent; muddiness; foulness.
2. That which is feculent; sediment; lees; dregs.
\Fec"u*lence\, n. [L. faeculentia dregs, filth: cf. F. f['e]culence.] 1. The state or quality of being feculent; muddiness; foulness.
2. That which is feculent; sediment; lees; dregs.
More Law School Talk
A symposium entitled Being and Becoming a Law Student found here. A worthwhile read for anyone who can find the time or is willing to procrastinate with even more reading. Here's a sampling:
I went to law school, hated virtually every minute of it, dropped out, dropped back in, and bitched and moaned like a toddler. But law school ultimately allowed me to do precisely the job I always most wanted to do: be a writer. I could not do what I do today -- cover the courts and the law -- unless I had gone to law school.
The huge irony is that if I had known back in law school how happy I would be 8 years later, I'd have had the time of my life! I would have loved my classes, taken more interesting ones, never gone to an event I hated, done even more clinical work, learned to salsa dance, and made better friends. It would have been like undergrad, but in better shoes. The reason I got stuck was because I let myself feel stuck, thinking that unless I treated law school the way everyone else treated it -- as a dark tunnel to the world of corporate law -- I was doomed.
The best thing about law school is that it really will blow open a thousand career doors for you. But you need to see them. You need to tap your way along the dark tunnel -- feeling for soft spots, and listening for folks on the other side to tap back. You need to be true to your heart; true to why you went in the first place. And you need to do whatever it takes to fight the fear and the sucking noise that will otherwise pull you into a life you may not want.
The Law and Everything Else
Stummy has a great post on how law students see and understand the world. So I guess this means that boyfriends/girlfriends can be said to not only be temporary but repudiative?
Tuesday, March 16, 2004
My Favorite Drink
And it can be my favorite drink, seeing that I don't have to worry about fetal alcohol syndrome.
If It Worked For Me, It Could Work For You
Liz cheerfully said hi to me today. Therefore, slapping ass is a good ice breaker. Now go try it Brian.
Fordyce Word Of The Day
abstruse
adj : difficult to penetrate; incomprehensible to one of ordinary understanding or knowledge
examples:
Niall's speech is usually abstruse.
Women's logic is abstruse.
adj : difficult to penetrate; incomprehensible to one of ordinary understanding or knowledge
examples:
Niall's speech is usually abstruse.
Women's logic is abstruse.
I'm In Good Company
Mark Cuban, owner of the NBA's Dallas Mavs and multi-rich guy, has his own blog here.
Well I'm Out $10
Two reasons why I'm going to lose this year's pool. First, I made my picks based on Pac-10 pride - I not only have Arizona getting past Duke, but I have them going to the Final Four. Second, there's more than just me in the tourney pool.
UPDATE: "Experts'" picks here and some advice on filling out a bracket here.
UPDATE: "Experts'" picks here and some advice on filling out a bracket here.
Something on Spain
UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh on why multilateralism probably isn't a good thing.
Those voters' position would be understandable -- perhaps not terribly sound in the long term, but understandable: The deaths were caused by Aznar's policies, since if he had not supported the Americans (over the opposition of most Spaniards, as I understand), the bombings probably wouldn't have happened; therefore, let's punish Aznar, and send politicians a message to prevent this from happening again.
But if that's so, then doesn't it show that we can't allow our foreign policy to be vetoed by other nations? After all, if we agree that we may not do what we think is right and necessary for our national security if any one of England, France, Russia, or China says "veto," then our enemies can paralyze us simply by influencing one foreign country. The influence might be exerted by bribes (more here), or by threat of terrorist violence. But one way or another, an enemy that couldn't break down our resolve could still stop us from doing what needs to be done by breaking down the resolve of one of the veto-owning countries.
The foreign countries' decisions may simply be probative of their own desire not to be attacked, not of what's the morally right thing to do in the abstract, or what's the practically right thing to do for us (or even what's in the aggregate interests of humanity generally). And I don't see why we should ascribe to a view of legitimacy that makes our actions illegitimate whenever the terrorists are able to force other countries to oppose us.
More On Taiwan
The recent discussions of Annie and Brian on foreign policy leads me to link to this but don't for a moment think that I'm trying to add fuel to that fire. I'm just trying to give Brian another reason to hate the French.
China and France will hold rare joint naval exercises off the mainland's eastern coast on Tuesday, just four days before Beijing's rival, Taiwan, holds presidential elections.
China's official Xinhua news agency made no link between the exercises off Qingdao -- about 780 miles from Taiwan's northernmost point -- and the election.
But the show of military strength and solidarity signaled China's desire to isolate the self-governing island before the vote and its first-ever referendum, which Beijing views as a provocative step toward independence.
Monday, March 15, 2004
Today
An uneventful day for most but unfortunately not for one of us. Here's to hoping Annie feels better soon.
Sunday, March 14, 2004
Stop Your Bitching
I was intially going to link to this because it has law school tips and who can't use more of those right? But now I'm linking to it because it includes this:
I'm annoyed. At least she's kind enough to prescribe beer as a remedy to law school ills.
Curving at a 2.9 is lame, and for the first time in your life, you will probably get a "bad" grade. If I can get a C+ in Crim Pro and survive, so can you. No, I never had gotten a C before in my life. Yes, it hurt.Well let me tell you, it hurts a hell of a lot more when the curve is a 2.3 and it's lamer too when C+ is considered a "good" grade.
I'm annoyed. At least she's kind enough to prescribe beer as a remedy to law school ills.
Did I Just Hear What I Heard?
Just saw Peter Jennings reporting from Iraq and he expressed surprise that the Iraqi's were actually grateful towards the U.S. military. I guess it's still hard for some to believe that Iraqis in general prefer U.S. military presence rather than having a crazed, bloodthirsty dicator in control.
Moot Court Round 2
Well moot court is mercifully over for me. I'll do a full write up of today's moot court round when I finish Monday's reading.
UPDATE: This is how second round went: First up was Peters, and he did fine. He didn't do as well as he did last week though. He didn't know his intro quite as well and when he asked the court whether he should give a recitation of the facts I think he was tripped up a little when the C.J. said, "It's up to you counselor. We know the facts." So it began. The justices were a little tougher on him this time around. It was a hot bench and he, like all of us there, were constantly interrupted and constantly challenged on everything we asserted. Peters' voice cracked a couple of times but it wasn't too noticeable - maybe I'm just used to it. He was no where near as persuasive with his arguments this time around as well. Also, at the end when he asked if he could conclude, the C.J. said, "You may, but briefly, in one or two sentences." Of course, Peters went on for about five sentences. As a last note on Peters' performance, he forgot to reserve time for rebuttal but in his defense - I can't believe I'm defending the guy - he wasn't reminded about it by the bailiff as opposing counsel was last week. But overall not a bad performance considering it was a very challenging court.
Next up was myself and it was bad. I mean bad. I really should have prepared more. So I stumble through my intro and sensing that I was having some trouble the court jumped in. All I remember is that I grilled on due process and I wasn't giving an ok, let alone a good, response to any of the questions. I think the C.J. was a bit annoyed with me especially when I couldn't tell him where the due process clause as it applied to the states was found in the amendments. It was very tough and I got some sympathy from one of the justices who tried to toss me a softball but I missed that one as well. This is how BS the whole thing is though. At the end, I was told that I started off great and was answering their questions well and were surprised when I said, "I'm done" when the five minute card came up.... That's right I tried to conclude halfway through. But not even conclude because I didn't say anything to the effect of, "So in conclusion..." or "For the foregoing reasons..." rather I just said, "I'm done." Of course, as I was about to walk away, much to everyone's dismay, I was told by the C.J. that I wasn't done by a "No, no you're not." So I stayed up there for five more minutes getting my ass handed to me. As I was saying though, it's all BS because, as they encourage everyone, I too was encouraged to go on. I expressed my disinterest at continuing with repeated 'I'm dones.' and was repeatedly encouraged to go on. Whatever.
The opposing counsel of Yumna and Halil did a fine job. They too were attacked repeatedly by the court and at times were caught off guard but they handled it well. Yumna was pressed on police misconduct and Halil was caught on due process like I was. Not too much detail on them because I wasn't paying too close attention seeing that I wasn't going to rebut.
Anyway, it's all over for me. Of the four of us in the room, I think Peters and Halil are going on to the third round. Yumna is going to be up north visiting her sister during third round. Yours truly, will be trying frantically to catch up on his studies.
UPDATE: This is how second round went: First up was Peters, and he did fine. He didn't do as well as he did last week though. He didn't know his intro quite as well and when he asked the court whether he should give a recitation of the facts I think he was tripped up a little when the C.J. said, "It's up to you counselor. We know the facts." So it began. The justices were a little tougher on him this time around. It was a hot bench and he, like all of us there, were constantly interrupted and constantly challenged on everything we asserted. Peters' voice cracked a couple of times but it wasn't too noticeable - maybe I'm just used to it. He was no where near as persuasive with his arguments this time around as well. Also, at the end when he asked if he could conclude, the C.J. said, "You may, but briefly, in one or two sentences." Of course, Peters went on for about five sentences. As a last note on Peters' performance, he forgot to reserve time for rebuttal but in his defense - I can't believe I'm defending the guy - he wasn't reminded about it by the bailiff as opposing counsel was last week. But overall not a bad performance considering it was a very challenging court.
Next up was myself and it was bad. I mean bad. I really should have prepared more. So I stumble through my intro and sensing that I was having some trouble the court jumped in. All I remember is that I grilled on due process and I wasn't giving an ok, let alone a good, response to any of the questions. I think the C.J. was a bit annoyed with me especially when I couldn't tell him where the due process clause as it applied to the states was found in the amendments. It was very tough and I got some sympathy from one of the justices who tried to toss me a softball but I missed that one as well. This is how BS the whole thing is though. At the end, I was told that I started off great and was answering their questions well and were surprised when I said, "I'm done" when the five minute card came up.... That's right I tried to conclude halfway through. But not even conclude because I didn't say anything to the effect of, "So in conclusion..." or "For the foregoing reasons..." rather I just said, "I'm done." Of course, as I was about to walk away, much to everyone's dismay, I was told by the C.J. that I wasn't done by a "No, no you're not." So I stayed up there for five more minutes getting my ass handed to me. As I was saying though, it's all BS because, as they encourage everyone, I too was encouraged to go on. I expressed my disinterest at continuing with repeated 'I'm dones.' and was repeatedly encouraged to go on. Whatever.
The opposing counsel of Yumna and Halil did a fine job. They too were attacked repeatedly by the court and at times were caught off guard but they handled it well. Yumna was pressed on police misconduct and Halil was caught on due process like I was. Not too much detail on them because I wasn't paying too close attention seeing that I wasn't going to rebut.
Anyway, it's all over for me. Of the four of us in the room, I think Peters and Halil are going on to the third round. Yumna is going to be up north visiting her sister during third round. Yours truly, will be trying frantically to catch up on his studies.
Moot Court Unscripted
Second round for me today and all I'm doing to prepare is to go over Halil's brief when I get to campus. Good thing plaintiff/defendant is semi-appropriate. Save the well wishes because I intend this to be my last round of oral arguments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)