A 2.8 (I was curious so I "jumped through the hoops") was only in the Top 40%? With a 2.3 curve, I'd have thought that was good enough for at least Top 30% or Top 20%....
I can't figure out why you're not doing better. You're obviously very intelligent if you got into/did well at UCLA. This blawg is humorous, but it's also (in my opinion) well written. I hope your grades this semester turn out much better than you expect.
4 comments:
Either you are tooting your own horn or I am missing something.
A 2.8 (I was curious so I "jumped through the hoops") was only in the Top 40%? With a 2.3 curve, I'd have thought that was good enough for at least Top 30% or Top 20%....
Not really tooting - especially since I finished the year in the bottom half. Just saying that I was overly worried.
I can't figure out why you're not doing better. You're obviously very intelligent if you got into/did well at UCLA. This blawg is humorous, but it's also (in my opinion) well written. I hope your grades this semester turn out much better than you expect.
Post a Comment