Forensic Evidence was a racehorse exam wholly unlike the previous exams the professor had posted up for review. The essay portion of the exam also contained a few red herrings - a couple of which I went fishing after. The first call of the question asked what further testing would you ask to be done on a gunshot wound and two fingerprints - very CSI-like. The second call of the question asked about the evidentiary value of the gunshot wound and the fingerprint evidence and the issues that might arise. Most people didn't get much out of the first call of the question.
The multiple choice portion was pretty much what was expected though the professor was a bit tricky with some of the wording.
All in all I think I got at least a C+, most definitely not an A, probably something in the B family - but not with the + sign.
No comments:
Post a Comment